PROCESSOR COMPARISON
Trinnov AltitudeCI vs Altitude32
Compare the network-first AltitudeCI with the high-channel-count Altitude32.
PRODUCT VIEW
See the products side by side
Decision pointAltitudeCIAltitude32
Architecture2U network-first / scalable licensingTraditional Altitude reference chassis
Standard scale8–32 outputs in 2-channel stepsHigh-channel-count fixed platform
AoIPNative Dante / AES67More traditional I/O architecture
Analog8 balanced analog outputsGreater emphasis on local analog outputs
Best fitModern digital / hybrid racksLarge conventional reference racks
HOW TO READ THE DIFFERENCE
Architecture matters more than badge hierarchy.
The question is not which is newer. AltitudeCI is optimised for scalable, networked custom integration; Altitude32 remains relevant where a larger traditional Altitude I/O architecture better matches the rack and amplifier system.
The right answer depends on the speaker count, subwoofer strategy, room-correction workflow, amplifier interface, video requirements and how much expansion the cinema may need later.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC COMPARISON
Compare them against your actual cinema.
Email the speaker layout, room size, subwoofer plan and amplification architecture.