PROCESSOR COMPARISON

Steinway P300 2.1 vs Lyngdorf MP-60 2.1

They share RoomPerfect and a common engineering heritage, but one is the centre of a proprietary fully digital Steinway system while the other is a conventional high-end processor for open amplification ecosystems.

PRODUCT VIEW

See the products side by side

Steinway Lyngdorf P300 2.1
Steinway Lyngdorf P300 2.1
Lyngdorf MP-60 2.1
Lyngdorf MP-60 2.1
ArchitectureSteinway P300 2.1Lyngdorf MP-60 2.1
Native decoding16 channels16 channels
Room optimisationRoomPerfectRoomPerfect
Primary output architectureSteinway Digital Link16-channel processor / conventional system integration
HDMI5 in / 2 out · 40Gbps5 in / 2 out · 40Gbps
System scaleUp to 256 mapped speakers; stacked processors for larger native decoding16 native channels
Best fitComplete Steinway & Sons digital cinema ecosystemOpen high-end cinema using RoomPerfect
DECISION POINTS
01

Choose P300 when…

The loudspeakers, amplification and processor are being designed as one Steinway & Sons digital system.

02

Choose MP-60 2.1 when…

You want RoomPerfect and Lyngdorf processing while retaining a more conventional choice of downstream equipment.

03

Do not compare only channel counts.

Both decode sixteen native channels, but the P300 can map those channels across a much larger proprietary loudspeaker ecosystem.

04

The system architecture decides.

The decisive question is whether the room is being built as a Steinway system or as an open separates system.

MANUFACTURER REFERENCE

Official product information.

Specifications, licenses and regional availability can change. Confirm the final project configuration before ordering.

PROJECT-SPECIFIC COMPARISON

Compare them against the actual room.

Send the proposed speaker layout, subwoofer count, rack architecture and amplification plan.